rs10486567
This is a intron variant variant in the JAZF1 gene.
▶GWAS Catalog Trait Associations (4)
Genome-wide significant associations (p < 5×10⁻⁸) from the NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog.
GWAS Catalog Trait Associations (4)
Genome-wide significant associations (p < 5×10⁻⁸) from the NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog.
prostate carcinoma
prostate cancer
cancer
prostate specific antigen amount
▶Research that mentions this SNP (13)
▶Associations of prostate cancer risk variants with disease aggressiveness: results of the NCI-SPORE Genetics Working Group analysis of 18,343 casesAssociationN=18,343Brian T. Helfand et al.(2015)· Human Genetics
A case-case association study of 18,343 prostate cancer patients (16,515 European, 1,828 African-American) evaluating 36 validated PC-risk SNPs found that rs2735839 (G allele) on chromosome 19q13 in the KLK3 gene was significantly and inversely associated with aggressive disease and high Gleason scores in both populations (p = 9.343 × 10⁻⁸ overall, p = 1.042 × 10⁻⁵ European, p = 2.0 × 10⁻⁴ African-American).
▶Prostate cancer screening using risk stratification based on a multi‐state model of genetic variantsAssociationN=81,920Amy Ming‐Fang Yen et al.(2015)· The Prostate
Developed a multi-state genetic variant-based Markov model for personalized prostate cancer risk stratification using Finnish population data. The model incorporates three primary SNPs (rs4242382 OR=1.75, rs138213197 OR=3.60, rs200331695 OR=6.0) and an extended panel of genetic variants to predict 10-year PCa risk ranging from 43% in the top 5% risk group to 11% in the bottom 60%, with recommendations for age-optimized screening (47 years for highest risk vs 55+ years for average/low risk) and risk-adapted interscreening intervals (< 1 year to 6+ years).
▶A genome-wide association study of prostate cancer in West African menAssociationN=932Michael Blaise Cook et al.(2014)· Human Genetics
Genome-wide association study of 474 prostate cancer cases and 458 controls from West African men identified a novel prostate cancer susceptibility locus at 10p14 marked by rs7918885 (p=1.29×10⁻⁷), localized to an intron of the lncRNA gene RP11-543F8.2. A stratified analysis by Gleason score revealed additional associations including rs34575154 in PCDHA1 at 5q31.3 (p=3.66×10⁻⁸) for high-grade disease and rs985081 at Xq28 (p=8.66×10⁻⁹) for low-grade disease. Validation in the African Ancestry Prostate Cancer GWAS Consortium showed limited replication, with only rs2993385 at 10p14 reaching nominal significance (p<0.05), highlighting population-specific genetic architecture.
▶Early onset prostate cancer has a significant genetic componentAssociationN=4,630Ethan M. Lange et al.(2012)· The Prostate
This study demonstrates that 13 of 14 previously identified prostate cancer risk SNPs are significantly associated with early-onset prostate cancer (EO PCa; diagnosed ≤55 years), with effect sizes ranging from OR=1.15 to OR=1.55 per risk allele. Early-onset cases carried significantly more cumulative risk alleles (mean 12.4) compared to older-onset CGEMS cases (mean 11.9; p=1.7×10⁻⁵), suggesting common genetic variants play an increased role in earlier disease manifestation.
▶Significant associations of prostate cancer susceptibility variants with survival in patients treated with androgen‐deprivation therapyAssociationN=601Bo‐Ying Bao et al.(2012)· International Journal of Cancer
Analysis of 20 GWAS-identified prostate cancer susceptibility SNPs in 601 patients treated with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) found that rs16901979 at 8q24 was significantly associated with prostate cancer-specific mortality (HR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.45-0.87, p = 0.005) and rs7931342 at 11q13 was associated with mortality (HR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.43-0.98, p = 0.038). These variants may help predict survival outcomes in prostate cancer patients undergoing ADT treatment.
▶Evidence for an association between prostate cancer and chromosome 8q24 and 10q11 genetic variants in African American men: The flint men's health studyAssociationN=472Yunfei Wang et al.(2011)· The Prostate
Case-control study of 127 African American prostate cancer cases and 345 controls from the Flint Men's Health Study examining 24 SNPs previously associated with prostate cancer in European populations. Found nominal evidence (P<0.05) for association with three 8q24 SNPs (rs6983561 OR=1.55, rs16901979 OR=1.60, rs7000448 OR=1.41) and two 10q11 SNPs (rs7904463, rs10740051 OR=0.51), replicating 8q24 findings in African Americans and providing first evidence for MSMB region association in this population.
▶Common variants at 8q24 are associated with prostate cancer risk in Taiwanese menReviewMarcelo Chen et al.(2010)· The Prostate
Systematic literature review of 22 GWAS studies identifying 53 SNPs in 29 genomic loci associated with aggressive and progressive prostate cancer, particularly in low-grade disease. Functional analysis of 21 SNPs revealed involvement in the MYC/POU5F1B pathway (rs1447295, rs6983267, rs4242382), androgen receptor pathway (rs17021918, rs10486567, rs7679673, rs2939244), and PSA/KLK3 biomarkers (rs2735839, rs10993994). SNPs were integrated with somatic copy number aberration data, with 17 SNPs found in regions of recurrent CNAs predictive of progression; notably, rs1447295 and 7 other SNPs cluster in 8q24 gain regions harboring MYC.
▶Association of 17 prostate cancer susceptibility loci with prostate cancer risk in Chinese menAssociationN=443Siqun Lilly Zheng et al.(2010)· The Prostate
This population-based case-control study evaluated 17 prostate cancer susceptibility loci identified in European GWAS populations in Chinese men (288 cases, 155 controls from Shanghai). Two of 17 loci on chromosome 8q24 showed significant associations with prostate cancer risk (rs1016343: OR=2.07, P=9.4×10⁻⁴; rs10090154: OR=2.07, P=0.002). Multiple additional SNPs at 8q24 regions 1 and 2 were also significantly associated with prostate cancer risk, while region 3 SNPs showed mostly null associations. Results suggest that prostate cancer risk variants identified in European populations are also relevant for Chinese men.
▶Estimation of genotype relative risks from pedigree data by retrospective likelihoodsMethodsN=1,648Daniel J. Schaid et al.(2010)· Genetic Epidemiology
This methods paper presents a novel retrospective likelihood approach for estimating genotype relative risks from ascertained pedigrees, which adjusts for ascertainment bias by conditioning on the phenotypes of all pedigree members. The authors apply this method to 28 previously reported prostate cancer SNPs in Mayo Clinic pedigree data (469 affected men) and case-control samples (661 cases, 518 controls), demonstrating that relative risk estimates from pedigrees are consistent with odds ratios from case-control studies.
▶HNF1B and JAZF1 genes, diabetes, and prostate cancer riskAssociationN=6,731Victoria L. Stevens et al.(2010)· The Prostate
A nested case-control study in two prospective cohorts (CPS-II and PLCO) examining whether HNF1B and JAZF1 variants associated with both diabetes and prostate cancer mediate the inverse relationship between these diseases. Three HNF1B SNPs (rs11649743, rs4430796, rs7501939) were associated with decreased prostate cancer risk (OR 0.84-0.86) and marginally increased diabetes risk, while two JAZF1 SNPs (rs6968704, rs10486567) were associated with decreased prostate cancer risk but not diabetes. The associations persisted after stratification by diabetic status, indicating that diabetes does not mediate the SNP-prostate cancer relationships.
▶Individual and cumulative effect of prostate cancer risk‐associated variants on clinicopathologic variables in 5,895 prostate cancer patientsAssociationN=5,895Kader AK et al.(2009)· The Prostate
This case-case study of 5,895 prostate cancer patients from Johns Hopkins Hospital examined 20 genome-wide association study (GWAS)-identified risk SNPs for association with clinicopathologic variables of cancer aggressiveness. Only rs2735839 in KLK3 (p = 8.4 × 10⁻⁷) and rs10993994 in MSMB (p = 0.046) showed significant associations, but notably with the risk alleles being more frequent in less aggressive rather than more aggressive disease, likely reflecting PSA detection bias. The vast majority of the 20 tested SNPs showed no association with Gleason score, tumor stage, or aggressive disease phenotypes, suggesting they identify overall prostate cancer risk rather than aggressiveness.
▶Association of genetic polymorphisms at 8q24 with the risk of prostate cancer in a Japanese populationReviewNaoki Terada et al.(2008)· The Prostate
This systematic review identified 53 unique SNPs in 29 genomic loci associated with aggressive prostate cancer progression and poor outcomes from GWAS studies. Functional studies implicated 21 SNPs as modulating the androgen receptor pathway, MYC oncogene, and PSA-related genes, with rs1447295 and rs10993994 being replicated across multiple populations and associated with unfavorable pathological features in low-grade prostate cancer.
▶Chromosome 8q24 risk variants in hereditary and non‐hereditary prostate cancer patientsAssociationN=947Sun J. et al.(2008)· The Prostate
This Finnish family-based study analyzed gene-gene interactions between rs4242382 (8q24) and rs10486567 (7p15.2) in 947 subjects from 76 families with 228 prostate cancer cases. The risk allele A at rs4242382 showed OR=1.14 (95% CI 1.08-1.19) and rs10486567 showed OR=1.06 (95% CI 1.01-1.11) with a significant multiplicative gene-gene interaction (P<0.0001), suggesting synergistic epistasis for familial multiple prostate cancer, particularly in non-aggressive disease.
About JAZF1
This gene encodes a nuclear protein with three C2H2-type zinc fingers, and functions as a transcriptional repressor. Chromosomal aberrations involving this gene are associated with endometrial stromal tumors. Alternatively spliced variants which encode different protein isoforms have been described; however, not all variants have been fully characterized [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
View all JAZF1 variants →Gene information from NCBI Gene. Variant classifications from ClinVar.
Community Wiki
No community notes yet for this variant. Sign in to start one.
Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading comments…